Name Calling
Isaiah 50:4-9a; Luke 19:28-40; Luke 23:1-49
Rev. Karen Goltz
[LOUDLY] “Blessed is the king
who comes in the name of the Lord! Peace in heaven, and glory in the
highest heaven!” “Crucify him!” “He saved others, let him save himself
if he is the Messiah of God, his chosen one!” “If you are the King of
the Jews, save yourself!”
[REGULAR VOICE] I remember
chanting as a child, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but names
can never hurt me.” It seemed a sort of talisman, a magic charm to ward
off evil, or at least to soothe bruised feelings. Too bad it’s not
always true.
Upon his entrance into Jerusalem, Jesus
was hailed as the long-awaited Messiah, the one who was God’s Anointed,
destined to restore the kingdom of Israel to one of justice, and might,
and peace. The people cried out to him their hails of praise, and with
their hails, the people named Jesus Messiah, as he rode into Jerusalem.
And for the first time in Luke’s gospel, Jesus allowed himself to be
publicly recognized. Before this, he commanded silence regarding his
identity, silencing the demons he’d exorcised, and even insisting that
his disciples keep silent about him after Peter correctly identified him
as the Messiah. Throughout his ministry, Jesus never denied that he was
the Christ, but he never wanted that information to be made public. But
when it came time for him to enter Jerusalem, it seems like he was ready
to be known. He even named himself when he sent two of his disciples to
get the colt, instructing them to tell anyone who asked that it was ‘the
Lord’ who needed it. Never before in Luke’s gospel had Jesus allowed
himself to be known publicly as ‘the Lord’, but as he prepared to enter
Jerusalem, he prepared to claim that title, and everything that went
along with it.
And it seems like the crowds responded
appropriately, honoring him with their hails. And with their honor and
praise and confidence, they called him names: Lord, Messiah, Christ,
King.
And those names caught the attention of
the religious leaders in Jerusalem. In the chapters between Jesus’
entry into Jerusalem and the Last Supper, Luke tells of many attempts on
the part of the chief priests, the scribes, the Pharisees, and the
Sadducees to test Jesus. They were hoping to trip him up and give them
something—anything—they could use to prove that he wasn’t
really entitled to those names.
Only, Jesus passed all their tests and
used all their traps against them. His wisdom made people doubt not who
Jesus was, but the right of the religious leaders to call themselves
religious leaders. Truth be told, Jesus really made them all look
pretty stupid and incompetent, and it became a power struggle between
‘either’ and ‘or’. Either Jesus was the Messiah and the religious
leaders were incompetent fools, or Jesus was a blasphemer with no
legitimate claim to the name ‘Lord,’ and the religious leaders were the
authoritative protectors and interpreters of God’s Word. And the crowds
sat back and watched the struggle, interested to see who would win this
battle, who would prove to be the most powerful.
And in the end, there really was no
battle. Jesus was arrested, and he never tried to fight back. The only
words he spoke in his own defense were a simple acknowledgement of the
situation: The chief priests and the scribes ask Jesus if he is the Son
of God, and Jesus simply points out that they are saying that he is.
Later when Pilate asks him if he’s the King of the Jews, Jesus simply
says, “You say so.” And then Jesus never speaks another word until his
way to the cross, when he speaks to some women who are crying for him.
None of his last words, those he spoke to those women or those he
uttered from the cross, were any kind of resistance or protest against
what was happening to him.
For the crowd, Jesus’ lack of
resistance proves that he must not really be the Messiah after
all. They must’ve been mistaken when they hailed him with their
“blessed be’s.” Maybe they were driven by anger at having been duped,
or maybe they were driven by fear of the religious leaders, the ones who
obviously had the real power, that they might be punished for
having blasphemed when they hailed this powerless criminal. Whatever
the case, the shouts of praise turn into demands for his death, a demand
that was met.
The charge against Jesus was that he
claimed to be the King of the Jews. It was even inscribed above his
head as he hung there on the cross, slowly suffocating. The charge was
an automatic death sentence in the Roman Empire. The authorities didn’t
really think that this Jewish peasant might actually topple the mighty
Caesar, but any challenge to the Roman rule had to be dealt with
swiftly and violently. That was policy. This same charge was also a
threat to the Jewish religious officials because it challenged their
authority to interpret and enforce the Word of God. Their prophesies
told them that the Son of God, God’s Messiah, would restore the kingdom
of Israel, and he would rule it in such a way that the people would live
in peace and righteousness with God. That this poor peasant would dare
claim to be that Messiah was personally offensive to them. Surely God’s
Messiah would come in power and glory, a stately presence that just
oozed authority, as their traditions remembered their beloved King
David. David had ruled over Israel when she was a powerful unified
nation, a nation to be contended with. If such a man as that had come
claiming to be the Messiah, and he proved the validity of his claim by
affirming the teachings of the religious leaders as he worked to unify
Israel once again, then perhaps they would have supported him. Instead,
the one claiming to be the Messiah seemed intent on challenging the
religious leaders and debunking their claims of righteousness before
God, and he had no armies with which to unify the people of Israel back
into a single powerful nation.
It’s ironic, really. The Romans wanted
to kill Jesus just as a matter of policy; his claims implied a threat to
the Emperor, and, even though he obviously wasn’t really a
threat, they had to kill him anyway, just in case. The Jews wanted to
kill Jesus because he wasn’t really a threat to the
Emperor. If he had been, then he might really be the Messiah,
and of course the religious leaders would have supported the real
Messiah.
So the charge that Jesus was the King
of the Jews was a joke to both the Romans and the Jews. They mocked
him, they nailed him to a cross, and then they continued to mock him and
call him names. They called him the same names he was called when the
crowds had hailed his coming into Jerusalem, when the crowds thought he
might actually be deserving of them. After all, despite Jesus’ commands
for silence, word about him had spread anyway, and it had seemed like he
was fulfilling the prophesies of God’s Anointed One. Even the way he
came into Jerusalem, riding a colt, fulfilled the prophesies. But now,
as he hung there on the cross, his life slowly and painfully draining
away, the crowds and religious leaders called him those same names.
Only this time they were being sarcastic, and they meant to be cruel.
They wanted their name-calling to cause as much pain and suffering as
the actual crucifixion did.
And the greatest irony of all is that
the charge against Jesus correctly identified who he was. He was
the King of the Jews. He was God’s Anointed One. And even
suffering, hanging from the cross, he was still just as deserving
of the names Lord, Messiah, Christ, and King as he had been when he rode
into Jerusalem in honor and glory. Even suffering, hanging from the
cross, he was fulfilling the prophesies. “I gave my back to those who
struck me, and my cheeks to those who pulled out the beard; I did not
hide my face from insult and spitting.”
But the crowds would not consider a
Messiah who suffered. They would probably claim with confidence that
their Messiah was so powerful that he could even defeat death, but they
would be appalled by the suggestion that he would first have to confront
death and succumb to it in order to defeat it. The crowds would boldly
claim that their Lord was a forgiving Lord, forgiving them all their
sins, but they would deny that the Lord himself would have to pay the
penalty for those sins, including the sin of murdering God’s own Son,
forgiving them for that sin even as he paid the price for it.
The crowds are a funny group. They
shouted their praise when Jesus seemed to be what they were looking for,
then changed their cries to ‘crucify him!’ when it appeared that his
lordship differed from what they wanted or expected. After his
resurrection some of them were able to believe, and boldly called him
‘Lord’ once again, proclaiming that he ruled their lives. Yet even
believing, they try to put limits on that lordship, naming him Lord but
keeping their own authority and counsel. They attend worship services
and hear the triumphant Easter proclamation that he is risen, and they
try to forget that in order to rise, he first had to die. They sing,
“Blessed assurance, Jesus is mine” as they conveniently overlook the
fact that for Jesus to be theirs they also have to be his, and that his
commandment to obey the law and love all their neighbors is meant
for them to actually obey. They gratefully accept the forgiveness of
their sins, but they want to do that without accepting that they are
sinners in need of forgiveness, no matter what they do or how hard they
try or how good a person they think they are. They don’t acknowledge
how often they praise Christ with their shouts of “blessed be” only to
turn on him and crucify him with their words and actions, then turning
their words back into ‘blessed be’s’ again when it’s convenient for
them. They would much rather just remember the promise, and forget why
that promise is needed.
The crowds named Jesus Lord and Christ,
and that name accomplished his death. But after his death came his
resurrection, his triumph over death, the saving act that reconciles us
with the God who so loved the world that he gave his only Son, so that
everyone who believes in him may not perish, but have eternal life.
That saving act caused those who believe to be named Christians. What
will that name accomplish in us?