From Athens to America
Acts 17:22-31
by Rev. Richard Gehring
We live in a time when the Christian faith clearly does not hold
the same status and influence it once held in the Western world. In
recent years, a number of outspoken atheists have gained great
notoriety. Some of the best selling books in the past few years have
included Richard Dawkins' The God Delusion and Christopher Hitchins'
God Is not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything. A few years ago,
a survey of some 35,000 Americans found that nearly one in six
claimed no religious affiliation. The study counted more atheists
than Episcopalians, nearly as many agnostics as Presbyterians, and
more people who identified themselves as “nothing in particular”
than all the Methodists, Lutherans and Mennonites
combined. (religions.pewforum.org)
Many churches have responded to this antagonism and apathy by trying
to engage the culture in more creative ways. One church in Seattle,
for example, has thoroughly embraced technology. The church
currently consists of congregations on 15 campuses in five states.
All are connected by high definition video that allows one pastor to
preach simultaneously at all 42 services in each of the 15 venues.
But while the medium may be cutting edge, 21st century, the theology
is a throwback to the “old time religion” of a hundred years ago.
Women, for example, are not allowed to speak from the pulpit in this
church. And many have criticized church leaders for dealing harshly
with anyone that has any dissenting opinions.
Another congregation in Grand Rapids, Michigan has taken a decidedly
different approach to making the ancient Christian faith meaningful
in a post-modern world. This congregation places little emphasis on
high-tech production. For example, a pastor I know who visited a few
years ago tells of a sermon on the Parable of the Ten Virgins that
was illustrated not with video clips and PowerPoint, but with ten
girls dressed in white who followed the pastor around the auditorium
as he preached. The theology of this Michigan church is also quite
different than the one in Seattle. In fact, the former pastor caused
quite a stir in evangelical circles when he published a book called
Love Wins in which he suggests that hell may not be a literal place
of eternal torment.
As different as these two churches are, however, they have some
things very much in common. Each attracts more than 10,000 people to
multiple services every weekend. Each is held up as an example for
how the church might engage contemporary North American culture. And
each, interestingly, has chosen the same name: Mars Hill.
Mars Hill—the original Mars Hill, that is—is found in Athens. It is
a large rock located on the Acropolis—the high point in the city
once home to many temples to Greek gods and Roman emperors. It was
also the site where the city elders would meet in ancient times,
acting as the final court of appeals for Athens. And it is here as
well that we find Paul in our scripture reading for today.
The fact is that the apostle Paul was not actually planning to go to
Athens. He had been at Bereoa, some 200 miles north of the city,
when things began to get ugly for him. So the members of the church
there decided it would be best for Paul to simply leave town. Some
of them escorted him all the way to Athens. And he waited there
alone until his companions, Silas and Timothy, could rejoin him.
Athens was the most important city in the entire Greek world. Under
Roman rule, its political influence was rather minimal. But it still
held great importance as a cultural and religious center. Many
people still came to the temples of Zeus and Athena and Augustus,
among others, to offer their worship and sacrifice. But for an
increasing number of folks the ancient myths about the gods and
goddesses were losing their importance. The old stories of heroic
battles were simply no longer meaningful. They did not address the
questions that the people of the day were asking about the meaning
of life.
And so for a growing number of Athenians, a wide variety of
philosophies and religions were gaining popularity. Chief among
these competing philosophies was Stoicism. According to the Stoics,
the world was ruled by divine reason. God was seen not as a
personality who interacted with humans, but as the fundamental
principle of cosmic logic. The main goal of Stoicism, then, was to
learn to accept that all things are controlled and directed by this
divine reason. Once one accepted that the universe existed as a
rational place, then one could live a life detached from the cares
and concerns of the world.
This is the physical and cultural setting, then, in which Paul found
himself. Paul, of course, was not one to wait idly. He did not
simply bide his time and take in the sights until Silas and Timothy
got there. Instead, he went to the synagogue, as he almost always
did when entering a new town, and he began to proclaim the message
of Christ's death and resurrection. He also went out into the public
marketplace and debated with the philosophers there.
Given Athens' acceptance of many different philosophical and
religious traditions, it is no wonder that Paul's message was
greeted with some curiosity and interest. The people of Athens think
that he is talking about two gods whom they have never heard of
before—gods named "Jesus" and "Resurrection." As consumers of new
religious ideas, they are intrigued by this teaching. So Paul is
invited to share more about what he means on Mars Hill—referred to
in our text by its Greek name: Areopagus. In today's text, then, we
read his speech before the "high council" of Athens.
This is one of the most famous sermons preached in the entire New
Testament. It is often studied as an example of how to do
evangelism. And, indeed, Paul demonstrates in this speech a high
level of understanding of the context in which he is preaching. He
is able to speak to the Athenians in terms that they should be able
to understand. He relates what he has to say with the customs and
traditions and teachings that they are familiar with.
Paul opens by complimenting the people of Athens on their extreme
religiosity. He tells them that he has admired the many temples in
their city. This should have appealed to them given their pride in
the tolerance they show to various religious teachings and in the
great works of art and architecture that were found in those
temples.
Later on in his sermon, in verse 27, Paul also talks about
"searching" for God. He says that we as humans "grope" and attempt
to "find" God. These certainly would have been familiar concepts as
well to the people of Athens. They prided themselves on their
unending search for truth, their constant groping for understanding.
They spent much time and effort in exploring as many different
avenues as possible for enlightenment and knowledge.
And, finally, Paul even quotes from Greek poets and philosophers. In
verse 28, he quotes a famous line from the Stoic poet Cleanthes,
"For we too are his offspring." It should not come as a surprise
that Paul was familiar with Stoic poetry, for his home town of
Tarsus was a center for Stoic teaching. Many modern biblical
scholars, in fact, believe that Paul's theology was greatly shaped
by Stoic thought.
Paul's familiarity with Greek thought and culture is certainly
apparent in what he says in this speech. But it is also evident in
what he does not say. One of the most curious things about this
speech is that there is no actual reference to "Jesus" or "Christ."
There is no mention made of the cross, which is so central to Paul's
teaching and theology. There is no allusion to the resurrection,
either.
Paul most likely didn't want to confuse the Athenians who might
think that there were several gods named "Jesus," "Christ" and
"resurrection." He knew that talking about things that had happened
in far away Palestine would have probably had little or no meaning
to people who thought that everything important happened in Athens,
or at least in Greece. And he knew that the Stoics at least would
not have cared about some historical events, for they believed that
one should remain detached from time—both past and future.
Instead, Paul used the familiar customs and teachings of Athens and
skillfully wove his message into them. He used all the citations
I've mentioned, but in each case he ultimately contrasted them with
his understanding of God as revealed through Jesus. When, for
example, Paul compliments the Athenians on their religiosity, he
notes that they have even gone so far as to erect an altar "to an
unknown god" just to make sure that no deity would be offended for
being inadvertently overlooked. Paul then claims to know who this
so-called unknown god is.
He proclaims the one true God, the maker of heaven and earth. This
God, says Paul, has no need for such temples or offerings. God has
created all things, including people, and is not dependent upon them
for anything. People do not manipulate this god through prayers and
sacrifices. Rather, God is ultimately in control of these people.
Next, when Paul speaks of the search for God, the groping to find
truth, he very subtly adds that one does not really need to look far
to find the true God. God, he says, is very near to us at all times.
It doesn't require great learning to uncover God. For God is, in
fact, not hidden at all. God is very near to each person.
And, to illustrate this, Paul even uses the language of the Stoics
themselves. He calls upon them to recognize that it is this God in
whom "we live and move and have our being." It is this God whose
offspring we are. Of course, when the Stoics used those phrases,
they were referring to the divine principle of cosmic rationality.
Paul, however, says that the one who truly fulfills these words is
the God of Israel, the God who was revealed in the person of Jesus.
Furthermore, to reach this God one does not have to have some
special knowledge or understanding. To relate to this God one does
not have to go to certain shrines or pay homage to certain images.
This God desires repentance. This God wants righteousness. This God
seeks relationship. This God, it seems, is vastly different than any
with whom the people of Mars Hill were familiar. For the God that
Paul speaks of is an active God, not a god that must be moved to
action through sacrifices to some gold or silver effigy. The God
that Paul speaks of is a relational God, not an impersonal force or
cosmic principle that regulates the universe.
It is indeed a brilliant speech. The message of Christ is preached
in a manner that should appeal to the people and culture of Athens.
Paul has taken the conventional wisdom and the accepted customs of
the city and skillfully woven them together with his insights into
the God which he follows and proclaims. In doing so, the traditions
and teachings of the Athenians are turned on their heads. The wisdom
of the philosophers is refuted. The practices of the people are
called into question. The truth is revealed.
And what exactly is the result of this masterful sermon? Was it
similar to the Pentecost sermon that Peter preached after which some
3000 people were baptized? Or was it like Peter's later sermon to
the friends and family of Cornelius, after which all of them were
baptized as the first Gentile Christians? No, the response to Paul's
message was much less enthusiastic. We are told that some scoffed,
some were interested enough to want to hear more, but only a few
actually believed what Paul had to say. The end of the chapter
mentions only two people and an unspecified number of “others with
them” who joined Paul and became believers.(v. 34) And nowhere in
the New Testament is any mention made of a church in Athens.
In many ways, ancient Athens is a lot like our post-modern North
American society. Like the people of Athens, we claim to hold an
"open" and "tolerant" view of different religious and philosophical
ideals. Like them, we place a very high value on reason and logic.
And like the ancient Athenians, our society is in the midst of a
great spiritual quest, struggling with questions of meaning and
purpose truth.
So it should come as little surprise that our culture tends to react
with some skepticism as well to the radical claims of Christ. We
doubt anyone who claims that there is something such as "The Truth."
We distrust a god for whom relationships are a higher priority than
reason, who proclaims love over logic. And so we continue to
struggle to find meaningful answers to our deep questions.
Paul desperately tried to address the questions and concerns of the
people of Athens. This master wordsmith and prominent theologian
gave a brilliant sermon that day. But the Athenians simply could not
comprehend the sort of God that he was talking about. That God did
not fit into their ideas about religion and philosophy and truth.
Paul's words, no matter how well-spoken and how well thought out
could not change their mindset conditioned by generations of custom
and tradition. It seems to me that the only thing that could have
convinced them of the reality of this relational God would have been
to be in relationship with one who personally knew God.
Unfortunately, that was something that Paul didn't have time for
right then. He hadn't even planned on being in Athens. He had just
come there to escape some troublemakers in Beroea. And we are told
that soon after his famous speech at Mars Hill, he left town and
headed to Corinth. There, he met Priscilla and Aquila. Silas and
Timothy also soon joined him. And for a year and a half they all
worked together as a team, demonstrating in deed as well as in word
the love and mercy of the God of Jesus Christ. There a church is
founded, with which Paul would have extensive correspondence.
Ultimately, the lesson we can learn from Paul's wise but rather
unsuccessful venture into Athens seems to be that it takes more than
words alone to change peoples' lives. It takes deep engagement. It
takes time. It takes commitment. It takes relationship.
Like ancient Athens, our society wants logical explanations. It
wants to know the answers to questions about life and meaning. But
it seems to me that those answers are not found in rational analysis
or intellectual debates. They aren't found in the latest technology
or in feel-good worship. The answers to the ultimate questions are
found in relationships, and in particular in relationship to God
through Jesus Christ. What society really needs, whether it knows it
or not, is relationship, not rhetoric.
So perhaps we as a church should maybe spend less time trying to
convince people and more time trying to connect with them. We should
be less concerned with saying the right words and more concerned
with living the right way. We should model ourselves less like a
corporation or a university or a media outlet and more like a
family—a family that lives and laughs and loves together; that works
and worries and weeps together; that disagrees and debates and
differs with each other but always remains a family. We are indeed
sisters and brothers in Christ. We are, as Paul told the Athenians,
children of the one true God, adopted through the work of the Holy
Spirit into a single family.
As the family of faith continues to grow and expand, it looks
different than it did almost 2000 years ago. Some of the challenges
that Paul faced at Mars Hill are similar to what we still face in
America today. People are still looking for a faith that can stand
up to reason—a faith that makes sense. People still have a lot of
spiritual options from which to choose; and we need to make sure
that our message is one that gets through in the midst of all the
other competing claims about who God is and is not. We still need to
look for ways to engage our culture in a meaningful manner.
Yet as we live out our faith together here, our witness will look
and sound and feel different than what has been proclaimed at Mars
Hill—whether we're talking about the one in Athens or in Seattle or
in Grand Rapids. Our witness will seek to address the questions
being asked by us and by our neighbors. It will look for ways to
live as God's family in this particular time and this particular
place. It will find expression in the lives of those with whom we
engage, those who are part of our relationships, those whom we
welcome as brothers and sisters and fellow seekers.