Page last updated

 


 



                        

Matthew 22:1-14                                       

 


The Great Supper
–A king throws a wedding banquet for his son. Trouble brews when the hand-delivered invitations are repulsed and the messengers ill-treated. In the end, the king gathers a menagerie of guests who never dreamed of attending until at last the wedding hall is filled.

How does Matthew portray the story? – Matthew binds the previous story with the two sons story to form a narrative trilogy; all are referents to Israel’s resistance to God’s invitation, and judgment. In Matthew’s allegorical retelling, the original invitation equates the plot with the call of Israel and the rejection; in the earlier parable, the servants are the messengers or prophets that God has sent. The blanket rejection of those invited suggests a conspiracy or rebellion. [1]

Double-Edged Point –Those who find themselves the intended guests, the original guests must take care that they do not miss God’s day of visitation, miss the invitation to participate in God’s plans. But on the other hand, those who find themselves surprisingly in God’s great banquet hall cannot presume on grace, and are thus warned of what happens to those do nothing but show up.

     

 

  • Wedding planners suggest that about 25% of a couple’s wedding invitees will not actually attend the wedding or reception. What wedding invitations have you declined? Why? What would cause wedding invitees not to come?
  • Ever show up at a gala ill-dressed? Isn’t the king being a little too rash when he banishes the ill-clad guest?
  • If this suggests some type of mission, how might this story change or transform our way of doing outreach or mission?

 

Barbara Brown Taylor has published a homily on this passage that focuses primarily the appropriate dress part of the parable: Home By Another Way, by Barbara Brown Taylor (Cambridge: Cowley Publications, 1999), pp. 192-196.

_______________________________________________
[1] New Interpreter’s Bible VIII (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 2000), page 419.