Page last updated

 

 



                                                         

Luke 24:36b-48                                                   

 

structure - Luke frames this story with: 1) a traditional greeting; 2) physical verification; 3) theological verification; and 4) the commissioning of the disciples.

appearance and proofs - Luke, more than any other gospel writer, is interested in the reality of the physical body of the risen Lord. While the mere appearance of Jesus brings some to faith, in Luke, it is the proofs that lead to belief. [1]

luke’s certitude - Luke wants to give us proofs for the resurrection of Jesus; for some, such proofs are reassuring and faith-inspiring; for others such evidence is moot. But we know that something changed the disciples, something sustained them through their upcoming trials; something centered their teaching not so much in the teachings of Jesus as in the central notion of the death and resurrection of Jesus. But for us,"where the Lord’s physical hands and feet are not longer present, the ministry of the hands of countless saints in simple and sincere ministries continues to bear witness to the Lord’s living presence. Although he may not appear in our midst to eat broiled fish, his presence is tangible in soup kitchens, around the kitchen table, and around the altar table . . . As in the first century so now the most convincing proof of the resurrection is the daily testimony of the faithful that the Christ still lives and the work of his kingdom continues." [2]

 

What has more important to your faith-lectures concerning physical evidence of Jesus’ resurrection? The stories of Jesus appearing to his followers following his death? The Scriptures that point to a suffering / rising Messiah? Changed lives in light of Jesus’ continuing presence?

Which post-resurrection story about Jesus do you enjoy most? (Anywhere in the synoptic or Johannine traditions?)

 

Two popular books that many Christian distributors are placing in public bookstands are Case for Christ and Case for Faith, both by atheist-turned Christian, Lee Stroebel. The first book tells of his own personal journey to faith in Christ. The second book provides biblical, theological answers to tough questions that presumably non-Christians are asking. It would be useful to draw upon these popular books as a way to connect with Luke’s agenda of providing evidence for faith. But don’t stop there, for many persons seek a different kind of "evidence" for Christianity and faith. I would also explore New Interpreter Bible’s (vol. !X) commentary section on this, a part of which is quoted above as a way to see Christ still active-though with different hands and feet.

_____________________________________
[1] The New Interpreter’s Bible IX (Nashville: Abingdon Press, 1995), pp. 486.
[2] Ibid, page 490.