In our
lesson-which really interrupts an ongoing progression of thought-the writer summarizes the
gospel. Two comings of Christ are intimated and the writer establishes coherence between
the two-between what has been accomplished (vs.11, 14)and the hope for what is yet to
happen (v.13).
The NRSV has two participles-bringing / training-following the opening line that
describe the impact of Christs initial coming to earth: "bringing salvation to
all," and instructing Christians to make moral adjustments to reflect the type of
people who await Christs return.
"The grace of God has appeared" indisputably refers to the
Christ-event, the incarnation. Irenaeus would love to preach on this passage! The emphasis
on educating, training, discipling, was a favorite understanding of Christs
redemptive work. The teaching here is both negative and positive in its outlook:
"refusing" on one hand and "living a godly life" on the other hand.
NIB-
The Christmas reading looks at the uniqueness of the Christian situation: Why is it
that a certain quality of life, love, and service is required of the followers of Jesus
Christ?
The even celebrated at Christmas provides the answer: "For the grace of God
has appeared, bringing salvation to all" (2:11) . . . the central theological theme
of the period of Advent returns as Christians are exhorted to right living because they
are living in the in-between-time. The grace of God has appeared in the incarnation. But
believers are to live lives marked by that grace as they "wait for the blessed hope
and the manifestation of the glory of our great God and Savior, Jesus Christ" (v.
13). He has come, and he will come again to judge the way Christians have lived the time
between the two comings. But Jesus is not only at the beginning and end of the Christian
way of life. Jesus is the one who gave himself unconditionally to free all people from
their sin, to offer the possibility of a new people of God who live in the
in-between-=time in a way modeled upon his self-gift (Titus 2:14).
One might get the feeling that
this writer envisions Christians as being "inbetween people," followers of
Christ who, in view of Christs return are characterized by tight personal moral
boundaries and who own a sober disposition. Just what we all have come to love-more rules
to add to our behavior list.
I think we have one of those "indicative / imperative" structures. In
view of Gods unfathomable, all-saving, completely transforming grace shown us in
Christ, the expected response is to live godly lives that reflect such redeeming love.
Beyond that, I wonder if were seeing an exceptionally high standard of
right living that was viewed even by pagans as exemplary and honorable? Cultures have
their own peculiar mores and taboos. So what might have been viewed admirably then may be
viewed with disdain now.